"The researchers also did a meta-analysis of 29 studies of more than 700 bat species to bolster and generalise their findings globally."
New York, April 20 - Contrary to the current belief that about half of earth's plants and animals would go extinct over the next century because of human activities, a study has found that this extinction rate is overly exaggerated.

The reason for the discrepancies is that island biogeographic theory was originally based on actual islands surrounded by water, and does not account for factors such as a countryside landscape's ability to support more species and slow extinction rates compared to true island ecosystems, the researchers said.

Especially in the tropics, island biogeographic theory's application is distorting our understanding and conservation strategies in agriculture, the enterprise on which the future of biodiversity most critically hinges.

Not only do more species persist across the 'sea of farmland' than expected by 'island biogeographic theory', novel yet native species actually thrive there, said Elizabeth Hadly, senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

This indicates that human-altered landscapes can foster more biological diversity than we anticipated, Hadly said.

The researchers now point to an alternative framework that promises a more effective way of accounting for human-altered landscapes and assessing ecological risks.

This paper shows that farmland and forest remnants can be more valuable for biodiversity than previously assumed, said Daniel Karp, post-doctoral fellow at University of California, Berkeley.

If we are valuing coffee fields and other human-made habitats at zero, we're doing a disservice to ourselves and wildlife, said Chase Mendenhall, a doctoral student at Stanford University.

To test the island theory against a more holistic theory of agricultural or countryside bio-geography, the researchers turned to bats in Costa Rica and on islands in a large lake in Panama.

Bats are acutely sensitive to deforestation.

The researchers also did a meta-analysis of 29 studies of more than 700 bat species to bolster and generalise their findings globally.

The study appeared in the journal Nature.


comments powered by Disqus
Read more on:
 NEW YORK (26931 views)
 GLOBAL (17901 views)
 FORD (10351 views)
 AGRICULTURE (9921 views)
 CALIFORNIA (7961 views)
 DEFORESTATION (7549 views)
 WILDLIFE (7381 views)
 HOLI (6191 views)
 EARTH (5591 views)
 ELIZABETH (5041 views)
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (4916 views)
 COFFEE (4591 views)
 DANIEL (4641 views)
 BERKELEY (4250 views)
 STANFORD (3981 views)
 PANAMA (3790 views)
 COSTA RICA (3474 views)
 STANFORD UNIVERSITY (3251 views)
 UNDERSTAND (2661 views)
 FOSTER (1881 views)
 STANFOR (1464 views)
 LDL (31 views)
 ALTERNATIVE (81 views)
 

PERMALINK

http://www.nerve.in/news:2535002368394
You can quote the permanent link above for a direct link to the story. We do not archive or expire our news stories.


STORY OPTIONS
  Email this story to a friend
  XML feed for Americas


 
COPYRIGHTS INFORMATION
All rights reserved for news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.
Contact Nerve Staff for any feedback, corrections and omissions in news stories.
 

All rights reserved for the news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.