"The draft guideline for regulating food high in fat, sugar and salt -, also popularly known as junk food, submitted by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India -, was not equipped to safeguard the health of school children, alleged Narain."
New Delhi, April 23 - The Delhi High Court Wednesday stressed the need to specify the junk food items that should be regulated in schools.

Hearing a plea seeking a ban on junk food in and around schools, the court asked advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, the amicus curiae in the case, to segregate the portion enforceable in the draft guidelines submitted by an expert panel.

A division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Pradeep Nandrajog asked the amicus curie to submit a report within three weeks and posted the matter for further hearing Aug 6.

The court's order came on a plea filed by social activist Rahul Verma of the NGO Uday Foundation, who demanded a ban on the sale of junk food in schools.

It further wanted the high court to initiate measures to discourage availability of fast food within 500 yards of schools in Delhi, besides formulating a canteen policy.

The draft guidelines recommended restricting/limiting availability of junk food in schools and nearby areas, instead of complete ban that was submitted by the working group.

The experts who drafted the guidelines are split on the issue.

Environmentalist Sunita Narain, who was part of the expert panel to render opinion on dietary habit and consumption of junk food amongst school children, alleged that the original recommendations were diluted to accommodate and protect the food industry.

The draft guideline for regulating food high in fat, sugar and salt -, also popularly known as junk food, submitted by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India -, was not equipped to safeguard the health of school children, alleged Narain.

The panel members suggested ban on junk food within a radius of 500 yards around schools. However, in the draft guidelines, the distance was reduced to 50 metres.


comments powered by Disqus
Read more on:
 INDIA (136901 views)
 DELHI (98661 views)
 NEW DELHI (72131 views)
 DELHI HIGH COURT (28236 views)
 HEALTH (17591 views)
 APRIL (14601 views)
 FOOD (12551 views)
 RAHUL (13001 views)
 CHIEF JUSTICE (7701 views)
 STRESS (6841 views)
 FAST FOOD (6381 views)
 ROHINI (5522 views)
 FOUNDATION (4901 views)
 DIVISION BENCH (3921 views)
 ADVOCATE (3811 views)
 AMICUS CURIAE (3667 views)
 SOCIAL ACTIVIST (3581 views)
 PRADEEP (2891 views)
 APRIL 23 (2680 views)
 SUNITA NARAIN (2603 views)
 GULATI (2351 views)
 RAHUL VERMA (1198 views)
 FOOD INDUSTRY (641 views)
 UDAY (581 views)
 2 (1241 views)
 JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG (41 views)
 NEERAJ KISHAN KAUL (11 views)
 

PERMALINK

http://www.nerve.in/news:2535002369224
You can quote the permanent link above for a direct link to the story. We do not archive or expire our news stories.


STORY OPTIONS
  Email this story to a friend
  XML feed for India


 
COPYRIGHTS INFORMATION
All rights reserved for news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.
Contact Nerve Staff for any feedback, corrections and omissions in news stories.
 

All rights reserved for the news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.