"functioning and activity of UPSC by rendering it amenable to manipulation or misuse by interested individual or groups."
New Delhi, April 27 - The possibility of a failed candidate attempting to take revenge on the selection commission members of the Union Public Service Commission - cannot be ruled out, said Delhi High Court as it agreed that disclosing their names will expose them to danger.

This was decided by Justice Manmohan while setting aside a Central Information Commission - order to disclose name of the interviewers along with their designation under the RTI Act. The court said that disclosure of names, addresses and qualification of the selection commission members would endanger the life and physical safety of those experts and it is, consequently, exempt under Section 8-- of the RTI Act.

The disclosure of names and addresses of the members of the interview board would ex facie endanger their lives or physical safety, the court said, keeping secret the identity of interviewers who were part of the committee to select candidates for the post of Drug Controller of India.

The court said that in the event of such information being made known, a disgruntled examinee who is not satisfied with the evaluation of the answer books, may act to the prejudice of the examiner by attempting to endanger his physical safety.

Any apprehension on the part of the examiner that there may be danger to his physical safety, if his identity becomes known to the examinees, may come in the way of effective discharge of his duties, Justice Manmohan remarked.

This applies not only to the examiner but also to the scrutiniser, coordinator and head examiners who deal with the answer book, it opined.

UPSC had sought dismissal of the plea arguing that the marks, views, opinions of the experts, who were on the interview board is held by the Commission in a fiduciary relationship.

It contended that the information relates to the core functioning of UPSC and its disclosure would seriously endanger the process of secrecy and confidentiality of the selection process as well as jeopardize the total

functioning and activity of UPSC by rendering it amenable to manipulation or misuse by interested individual or groups.

The court disposed of the case saying that disclosure of the identity of board member would not serve any fruitful purpose.


comments powered by Disqus
Read more on:
 INDIA (136901 views)
 DELHI (98341 views)
 NEW DELHI (71951 views)
 DELHI HIGH COURT (28236 views)
 JUSTICE (13301 views)
 HIGH COURT (13221 views)
 AMES (7311 views)
 MOHAN (6921 views)
 ECR (5791 views)
 UPSC (5442 views)
 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (5366 views)
 FRUIT (5401 views)
 INTERVIEW (5351 views)
 ISC (5011 views)
 COMMISSION (4701 views)
 RTI ACT (3989 views)
 RULED OUT (3971 views)
 SIO (4615 views)
 OSU (3361 views)
 ISU (3131 views)
 CANDIDA (3511 views)
 UNDER SECTION (2751 views)
 ELECTION PROCESS (2191 views)
 PARDI (1171 views)
 SECTION 8 (978 views)
 SERVICE COMMISSION (231 views)
 

PERMALINK

http://www.nerve.in/news:2535002370090
You can quote the permanent link above for a direct link to the story. We do not archive or expire our news stories.


STORY OPTIONS
  Email this story to a friend
  XML feed for India


 
COPYRIGHTS INFORMATION
All rights reserved for news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.
Contact Nerve Staff for any feedback, corrections and omissions in news stories.
 

All rights reserved for the news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.