"The monetary compensation in the case against the Congress party is being sought only by the individual plaintiffs, who are survivors or legal heirs of the 1984 victims, the SFJ said."
New York, April 29 - A US court has dismissed a lawsuit against India's Congress party relating to the November 1984 anti-Sikh violence, saying it did not sufficiently touch and concern the US court to exercise jurisdiction.

However, even as he dismissed the case filed by the US based rights group Sikhs for Justice -, Judge Robert W. Sweet of US District Court here ruled that corporate entities like the Congress party of India can be sued under Alien Torts Statute -.

On the issue of corporate liability, Sweet citing the case of Balintulo V. Daimler AG ruled that Daimler seems to concretely establish that a corporate defendant can be liable under the ATS, assuming that the statute's touch and concern' requirements are adequately alleged.

Accordingly, the fact that defendants are incorporated does not, in and of itself, relieve them of liability under the statute or remove this court's jurisdiction over plaintiffs' allegations, Sweet said in his April 24 ruling.

However, plaintiffs' combined facts, even if credited, are insufficient to establish that the conduct sufficiently 'touched and concerned' the US to establish jurisdiction under the ATS and dismissal is appropriate under 12--, he ruled.

The SFJ said it will challenge the dismissal of the case against the Congress party before the US Court of Appeals within 30 days as required under the federal rules of civil procedure.

The rights group asserted the case sufficiently touches and concerns the US and SFJ has institutional standing to seek declaratory judgment on November 1984 violence against the Sikh community after the assassination of former prime minister Indira Gandhi.

In support of its contention, the SFJ will argue that the plaintiffs have already been granted refugee status by California Federal Court as victims of violence which proves plaintiffs' sufficient connection to the US.

The monetary compensation in the case against the Congress party is being sought only by the individual plaintiffs, who are survivors or legal heirs of the 1984 victims, the SFJ said.

The SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun said the SFJ will argue that since India's Congress party commands, controls and directs the functioning of New York based Indian National Overseas Congress, the requirement of touch and concern is met.


comments powered by Disqus
Read more on:
 INDIA (136901 views)
 INDIAN (47121 views)
 NEW YORK (26931 views)
 WHO (19101 views)
 CONGRESS (16681 views)
 APRIL (14601 views)
 BALI (8421 views)
 CALIFORNIA (7961 views)
 INDIRA GANDHI (7931 views)
 YORK (6711 views)
 MMA (6051 views)
 RTS (6171 views)
 LAWSUIT (5705 views)
 CHE (5781 views)
 NIST (5711 views)
 CTI (5667 views)
 GROUP A (5221 views)
 24 (4381 views)
 ALREADY (3531 views)
 SIKH COMMUNITY (3194 views)
 ALIEN (2181 views)
 REFUGEE (1961 views)
 SASS (1921 views)
 ASSASSINATION (1741 views)
 2 (1241 views)
 

PERMALINK

http://www.nerve.in/news:2535002370439
You can quote the permanent link above for a direct link to the story. We do not archive or expire our news stories.


STORY OPTIONS
  Email this story to a friend
  XML feed for Americas


 
COPYRIGHTS INFORMATION
All rights reserved for news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.
Contact Nerve Staff for any feedback, corrections and omissions in news stories.
 

All rights reserved for the news content. Reproduction, storage or redistribution of Nerve content and articles in any medium is strictly prohibited.